Page 68 - CPG มะเร็งปากมดลูก
P. 68

62 แนวทางการปอ? งกนั และรกั ษามะเร็งปากมดลูก

                                     Metastasis (M)

   M0 No distant metastasis

  cM1 IVB Distant metastasis (includes metastasis to inguinal lymph nodes,
                  intraperitoneal disease, lung, liver, or bone; excludes metastasis to pelvic
                  or para-aortic lymph nodes or vagina)

  pM1 IVB Microscopic confirmation of distant metastasis (includes metastasis to
                  inguinal lymph nodes, intraperitoneal disease, lung, liver, or bone;
                  excludes metastasis to pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes or vagina)

Abbreviations: cM, clinical metastasis category; pM, pathologic metastasis category

เอกสารอา? งอิง

    1. Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. Revised FIGO staging for
         carcinoma of the cervix uteri. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2019;145(1):129-35.

    2. Corrigendum to “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri” [Int J Gynecol Obstet 145(2019) 129–135].
         International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2019;147(2):279-80.

    3. Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update. International Journal of
         Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2021;155(S1):28-44.

    4. Saleh M, Virarkar M, Javadi S, Elsherif SB, Faria SdC, Bhosale P. Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International
         Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging. American Journal of Roentgenology.
         2020;214(5):1182-95.

    5. Salib MY, Russell JHB, Stewart VR, Sudderuddin SA, Barwick TD, Rockall AG, Bharwani N. 2018 FIGO Staging
         Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging. RadioGraphics. 2020;40(6):1807-22.

    6. Fischerova D, Fr?hauf F, Burgetova A, Haldorsen IS, Gatti E, Cibula D. The Role of Imaging in Cervical Cancer
         Staging: ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines (Update 2023). Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 14;16(4):775.

    7. Thomeer, M.G., Gerestein, C., Spronk, S. et al. Clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the
         pretreatment staging of cervical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 23, 2005–2018 (2013).

    8. Olawaiye AB, Baker TP, Washington MK, Mutch DG. The new (Version 9) American Joint Committee on Cancer
         tumor, node, metastasis staging for cervical cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021;71(4):287-98.
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73